Editorial opinionstartupxo
The passage that bothers me most is the claim that blocking fingerprinting with an extension actually makes you more noticeable. The argument is that the fewer people who install a given extension, the more that trace becomes a clue. But the article does not show any evidence that real tracking companies actually work this way. It reads more like the author's interpretation than an established fact. If you put the browser you normally use into coveryourtracks.eff.org, you can quickly see which items make it most uniquely identifiable.
Writing language: Korean