- A survey commissioned by work management company Monday.com and conducted by Nielsen, in which executives and senior managers from 7 countries responded, according to the source. A total of 1,700 people responded.
- More than half of respondents said that after AI adoption, staff output became harder to evaluate because it is hard to tell who produced it. About half said they now spend more time reviewing and coaching team output than before.
- 46% of managers said they refer to AI when making judgments, and 39% of leaders said they draft performance review forms with AI. The source warns that this approach could increase evaluation bias.
- 57% of managers said more tools have been adopted in their companies than before. Levi, head of market research at Monday.com, said they expected the number of tools to fall, but it actually increased.
O: This is useful when a team briefly tests a rule that requires sharing how far AI was used before a manager evaluates team members' work.
X: The survey was commissioned by Monday.com and based on respondents' own answers, so it is hard to see it as a measurement of actual evaluation bias, and that point should be noted.